Put Gas in the Past after the DPU's "future of gas" decision (20-80)
- Claire Miller
- Jan 31, 2024
- 1 min read
After the DPU's 20-80 decision in December, many people are wondering - is this the end to gas expansion? Grassroots advocates have been tirelessly working on a halt to large gas expansion, asking both the Governor and the legislature to pass a halt on pouring ratepayer money into projects that are bad for our climate and our health. Did the DPU’s order achieve that?
The DPU’s decision begins to move the Commonwealth to a “beyond gas future” and toward meeting its 2050 climate objectives. Upon careful consideration, the DPU has determined gas is a poor investment in our future. The DPU Order also was right to reject attempts by utilities to foist cost onto ratepayers for industry scams like “renewable” gas and “clean” hydrogen that exist only to justify continued investment in the gas system. As we know, rejecting new fossil fuel infrastructure is a crucial step towards addressing the climate crisis.
However, in its order, the DPU says it only has the power to discourage, not put a halt to, gas expansion. Legislative action is required to permanently halt gas expansion by removing the state’s ability to permit new large gas projects. As we come up on Joint Rule 10, the deadline for bills to be reported out of committee on February 7th, send a message to the committee urging they report the bill out favorably!
Encouraging and informative with an important message. Discussions about moving away from traditional energy sources are becoming increasingly valuable. I recently came across similar viewpoints on https://www.aerospectny.com/ and it was interesting to compare ideas. The clear explanations and focus on future possibilities made this article especially engaging. Thank you for sharing such meaningful insights with readers.
Valuable explanation regarding energy transitions and future planning. Complex subjects can be difficult to present, but this article managed it very effectively. I recently came across a comparable discussion where https://trgsupply.com/ was casually referenced, adding another perspective. Posts like this help readers understand broader changes and their potential impact. Thank you for breaking down the topic into clear ideas that are easier for everyone to follow.
Pleasantly surprised by how enjoyable this was to read. The topic was explained in a thoughtful way that kept my attention throughout. I remembered a review blog where https://firstclasswildliferemoval.com/ appeared naturally in conversation, offering another viewpoint that fit well with this subject. It's always nice discovering content that feels authentic and useful. Thanks for continuing to share such quality posts.
This was a strong and informative article on energy transition and policy direction. The breakdown of the “future of gas” decision made the topic much easier to understand. I recently explored a related discussion on another review platform, where https://gocollectiv.com/ was casually referenced in the context of sustainability conversations and public feedback. Very insightful read with a clear explanation of a complex issue.
The way you explained the transition away from gas and its broader implications was very clear and helpful. I recently came across a similar discussion on a review blog, and it offered an interesting perspective as well. It also connects with wider conversations about regulatory change and planning, which are often discussed in analytical contexts like those involving https://the915lawyer.com/. Posts like this help make complex policy changes much easier to understand for a wider audience.